Network of discursive genres of support for the writing of the scientific article in Physics: Red de géneros discursivos de soporte para la escritura del artículo científico en la Física
This article proposes an approach to the teaching of the writing of the scientific article from the discursive genres, understood as action systems that serve to communicate, build linguistic, pragmatic, rhetorical and contextual meanings and grant identity to writers and readers. It is shown that t...
Uloženo v:
| Hlavní autor: | |
|---|---|
| Médium: | Online |
| Jazyk: | spa |
| Vydáno: |
Universidad de Sonora
2020
|
| On-line přístup: | https://estudioslambda.unison.mx/index.php/estudioslambda/article/view/101 |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Shrnutí: | This article proposes an approach to the teaching of the writing of the scientific article from the discursive genres, understood as action systems that serve to communicate, build linguistic, pragmatic, rhetorical and contextual meanings and grant identity to writers and readers. It is shown that the writing of the scientific article is accompanied by other scientific discursive genres, such as the paper, the poster and the summary, which work in a network and support to achieve the objective of communicating specialized knowledge. In this work, he realizes the disciplinary scientific writing of physicists in a Mexican public state university through a qualitative socio-anthropological investigation in which in-depth interviews were conducted based on the publications of each of the interviewees and the following Analysis categories: writing of the scientific article, career as a writer and group scientific production. This article realizes the first category. The results show that the network of discursive genres studied functions as an activity system that promotes the development of concepts, knowledge and skills of students that become opportunities for participation and serves tutors to teach complex knowledge through successive approaches to generate identity to doctoral students. On the other hand it is shown that the members of a discursive community participate unequally, this is explained by the. time and type of participation in their work groups and the discursive community itself. |
|---|
