Reliability and validity of an instrument to measure the socio-political dimension of the quality of life
The quality of life has been approached from socio-economic approaches that highlight the dimensions of well-being and ability as two axes prevailing theoretical and conceptual discussion. However, from a psychological view, this paper established the reliability and validity of an instrument that m...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Sprache: | spa |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Consorcio de Universidades Mexicanas A.C.
2015
|
| Online Zugang: | https://psicumex.unison.mx/index.php/psicumex/article/view/282 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| id |
oai:https:--psicumex.unison.mx-:article-282 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
oai:https:--psicumex.unison.mx-:article-2822021-08-15T07:04:59Z Reliability and validity of an instrument to measure the socio-political dimension of the quality of life Confiabilidad y validez de un instrumento que mide la dimensión sociopolítica de la calidad de vida García Lirios, Cruz Carreón Guillén, Javier Hernández Valdés, Jorge Rivera Varela , Bertha Leticia thermal environmental psychological well-being social housing habitability environmental perception calidad de vida bienestar subjetivo capacidades económicas percepciones sociales dimensión sociopolítica The quality of life has been approached from socio-economic approaches that highlight the dimensions of well-being and ability as two axes prevailing theoretical and conceptual discussion. However, from a psychological view, this paper established the reliability and validity of an instrument that measured eight factors indicative of sociopolitical dimension of quality of life. For this purpose, we conducted a cross-sectional study with a probabilistic sample of 245 students. Therefore, life satis- faction (alpha = 0.72; 45% of the explained variance), expected capacity (alpha = 0.74; 37%), trust relationships (alpha = 0.79; 33%), perception justice (alpha = 0.74; 31%), expectations of opportunity (alpha = 0.78; 27%), environmental assessments (alpha = 0.75; 25%), context rules (alpha = 0.71; 23%) and perceived resources (alpha = 0.75; 21%) were established as indicative factors of sociopo- litical dimension of quality of life [KMO = 6.25; chi-square = 14.25 (23 gl) p = 0.000]. Regarding the state of knowledge that has weighed directly to the quality of life from the subjective well-being and economic capabilities, the findings of this study were discussed to explain a scenario of economic and social crisis to which governors and governed react asymmetrically. La calidad de vida ha sido abordada desde aproximaciones socioeconómicas que resaltan sus dimensiones de bienestar y capacidad como dos ejes preponderantes de discusión teórica y conceptual. Empero, desde una visión más psicosocial, el presente trabajo estableció la confiabilidad y validez de un instrumento que midió ocho factores indicativos de la dimensión sociopolítica de la calidad de vida. Para tal propósito, se llevó a cabo un estudio transversal con una muestra no probabilística de 245 estudiantes. Por consiguiente, satisfacción de vida (alfa = 0,72; 45% de la varianza explicada), capacidades esperadas (alfa = 0,74; 37%), relaciones de confianza (alfa = 0,79; 33%), percepción de justicia (alfa = 0,74; 31%), expectativas de oportunidad (alfa = 0,78; 27%), valoraciones del entorno (alfa = 0,75; 25%), normas de contexto (alfa = 0,71; 23%) y recursos percibidos (alfa = 0,75; 21%) fueron establecidos como factores indicativos de la dimensión sociopolítica de la calidad de vida [KMO = 6,25; chi cuadrada = 14,25 (23 gl) p = 0,000]. En relación con el estado del conocimiento que ha ponderado directamente la calidad de vida desde el bienestar subjetivo y las capacidades económicas, los hallazgos del presente trabajo fueron discutidos para explicitar un escenario de crisis económica y social ante el cual gobernantes y gobernados reaccionan asimétricamente. Consorcio de Universidades Mexicanas A.C. 2015-12-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares application/pdf https://psicumex.unison.mx/index.php/psicumex/article/view/282 10.36793/psicumex.v5i2.282 Psicumex; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2015): PSICUMEX Semestral Journal July - December 2015; 79-92 Psicumex; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2015): Revista PSICUMEX Revista Semestral Julio - Diciembre 2015; 79-92 2007-5936 spa https://psicumex.unison.mx/index.php/psicumex/article/view/282/229 |
| institution |
Psicumex |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Online |
| author |
García Lirios, Cruz Carreón Guillén, Javier Hernández Valdés, Jorge Rivera Varela , Bertha Leticia |
| spellingShingle |
García Lirios, Cruz Carreón Guillén, Javier Hernández Valdés, Jorge Rivera Varela , Bertha Leticia Reliability and validity of an instrument to measure the socio-political dimension of the quality of life |
| author_facet |
García Lirios, Cruz Carreón Guillén, Javier Hernández Valdés, Jorge Rivera Varela , Bertha Leticia |
| author_sort |
García Lirios, Cruz |
| title |
Reliability and validity of an instrument to measure the socio-political dimension of the quality of life |
| title_short |
Reliability and validity of an instrument to measure the socio-political dimension of the quality of life |
| title_full |
Reliability and validity of an instrument to measure the socio-political dimension of the quality of life |
| title_fullStr |
Reliability and validity of an instrument to measure the socio-political dimension of the quality of life |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Reliability and validity of an instrument to measure the socio-political dimension of the quality of life |
| title_sort |
reliability and validity of an instrument to measure the socio-political dimension of the quality of life |
| description |
The quality of life has been approached from socio-economic approaches that highlight the dimensions of well-being and ability as two axes prevailing theoretical and conceptual discussion. However, from a psychological view, this paper established the reliability and validity of an instrument that measured eight factors indicative of sociopolitical dimension of quality of life. For this purpose, we conducted a cross-sectional study with a probabilistic sample of 245 students. Therefore, life satis- faction (alpha = 0.72; 45% of the explained variance), expected capacity (alpha = 0.74; 37%), trust relationships (alpha = 0.79; 33%), perception justice (alpha = 0.74; 31%), expectations of opportunity (alpha = 0.78; 27%), environmental assessments (alpha = 0.75; 25%), context rules (alpha = 0.71; 23%) and perceived resources (alpha = 0.75; 21%) were established as indicative factors of sociopo- litical dimension of quality of life [KMO = 6.25; chi-square = 14.25 (23 gl) p = 0.000]. Regarding the state of knowledge that has weighed directly to the quality of life from the subjective well-being and economic capabilities, the findings of this study were discussed to explain a scenario of economic and social crisis to which governors and governed react asymmetrically. |
| publisher |
Consorcio de Universidades Mexicanas A.C. |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| url |
https://psicumex.unison.mx/index.php/psicumex/article/view/282 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT garcialirioscruz reliabilityandvalidityofaninstrumenttomeasurethesociopoliticaldimensionofthequalityoflife AT carreonguillenjavier reliabilityandvalidityofaninstrumenttomeasurethesociopoliticaldimensionofthequalityoflife AT hernandezvaldesjorge reliabilityandvalidityofaninstrumenttomeasurethesociopoliticaldimensionofthequalityoflife AT riveravarelaberthaleticia reliabilityandvalidityofaninstrumenttomeasurethesociopoliticaldimensionofthequalityoflife AT garcialirioscruz confiabilidadyvalidezdeuninstrumentoquemideladimensionsociopoliticadelacalidaddevida AT carreonguillenjavier confiabilidadyvalidezdeuninstrumentoquemideladimensionsociopoliticadelacalidaddevida AT hernandezvaldesjorge confiabilidadyvalidezdeuninstrumentoquemideladimensionsociopoliticadelacalidaddevida AT riveravarelaberthaleticia confiabilidadyvalidezdeuninstrumentoquemideladimensionsociopoliticadelacalidaddevida |
| _version_ |
1714622300863594496 |
