Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychology Practice: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Forensic psychologists confront a myriad of ethical issues and are presented with special challenges to professional training and performance in the field. This study aims to identify the primary ethical issues facing forensic psychology and to carry out a bibliometric study focused on specialized l...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: Arellano, Luz Adriana, Rivera Heredia, María Elena
Μορφή: Online
Γλώσσα:spa
Έκδοση: Consorcio de Universidades Mexicanas A.C. 2021
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://psicumex.unison.mx/index.php/psicumex/article/view/380
Ετικέτες: Προσθήκη ετικέτας
Δεν υπάρχουν, Καταχωρήστε ετικέτα πρώτοι!
id oai:https:--psicumex.unison.mx-:article-380
record_format ojs
institution Psicumex
collection OJS
language spa
format Online
author Arellano, Luz Adriana
Rivera Heredia, María Elena
spellingShingle Arellano, Luz Adriana
Rivera Heredia, María Elena
Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychology Practice: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis
author_facet Arellano, Luz Adriana
Rivera Heredia, María Elena
author_sort Arellano, Luz Adriana
title Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychology Practice: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis
title_short Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychology Practice: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis
title_full Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychology Practice: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis
title_fullStr Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychology Practice: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychology Practice: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis
title_sort ethical issues in forensic psychology practice: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis
description Forensic psychologists confront a myriad of ethical issues and are presented with special challenges to professional training and performance in the field. This study aims to identify the primary ethical issues facing forensic psychology and to carry out a bibliometric study focused on specialized literature ranging from 2010 to 2019. Furthermore, this study examines the state of forensic psychology from an international perspective. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA standard recommendations. The search began from a pool of 7889 publications, from which were extracted 197 articles, selecting 16 for this study. A total of 124 ethical issues were identified, and they were resumed in 77, which were then classified into six categories: 1) objectivity, 2) intervention, 3) conflict of interest, 4) obtaining and use of information, 5) consent, and 6) professional competence. The bibliometric analysis identified that half of the manuscripts originated from the United States of America with none published in Latin America. Similarly, 87% were published in the English language with 12.5% published in Spanish. However, the Annals of Legal Psychology (Anuario de Psicología Jurídica) published most of the identified dilemmas. Psychology Injury and Law represented the journal with the most publications; the greatest number of articles were published in 2014. The bibliometric analysis suggests studies focused on dilemmas in forensic psychology are scarce and none were found to have been carried out in Mexico.
publisher Consorcio de Universidades Mexicanas A.C.
publishDate 2021
url https://psicumex.unison.mx/index.php/psicumex/article/view/380
work_keys_str_mv AT arellanoluzadriana ethicalissuesinforensicpsychologypracticeasystematicreviewandbibliometricanalysis
AT riveraherediamariaelena ethicalissuesinforensicpsychologypracticeasystematicreviewandbibliometricanalysis
AT arellanoluzadriana dilemaseticosenlapracticapsicologicaforenserevisionsistematicayanalisisbibliometrico
AT riveraherediamariaelena dilemaseticosenlapracticapsicologicaforenserevisionsistematicayanalisisbibliometrico
_version_ 1756584900494884864
spelling oai:https:--psicumex.unison.mx-:article-3802022-04-01T05:44:29Z Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychology Practice: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis Dilemas éticos en la práctica psicológica forense: Revisión sistemática y análisis bibliométrico Arellano, Luz Adriana Rivera Heredia, María Elena decision making Legal Psychology ethics ethical issues bibliometric toma de decisiones Psicología Jurídica ética problemas éticos bibliométrico Forensic psychologists confront a myriad of ethical issues and are presented with special challenges to professional training and performance in the field. This study aims to identify the primary ethical issues facing forensic psychology and to carry out a bibliometric study focused on specialized literature ranging from 2010 to 2019. Furthermore, this study examines the state of forensic psychology from an international perspective. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA standard recommendations. The search began from a pool of 7889 publications, from which were extracted 197 articles, selecting 16 for this study. A total of 124 ethical issues were identified, and they were resumed in 77, which were then classified into six categories: 1) objectivity, 2) intervention, 3) conflict of interest, 4) obtaining and use of information, 5) consent, and 6) professional competence. The bibliometric analysis identified that half of the manuscripts originated from the United States of America with none published in Latin America. Similarly, 87% were published in the English language with 12.5% published in Spanish. However, the Annals of Legal Psychology (Anuario de Psicología Jurídica) published most of the identified dilemmas. Psychology Injury and Law represented the journal with the most publications; the greatest number of articles were published in 2014. The bibliometric analysis suggests studies focused on dilemmas in forensic psychology are scarce and none were found to have been carried out in Mexico. La función del psicólogo forense enfrenta múltiples dilemas éticos, presentando especiales desafíos para la formación y ejercicio profesional. Este estudio tiene como objetivo identificar los principales dilemas éticos con los que se enfrenta en la práctica el psicólogo forense expuestos por la literatura especializada de 2010 al 2019 desde una perspectiva internacional, además de realizar un análisis bibliométrico. Para ello, se llevó a cabo una revisión sistemática siguiendo las recomendaciones del estándar PRISMA. La búsqueda partió de una base de 7889 artículos, de la cual se extrajeron 197 para finalmente seleccionar 16 para este estudio. En ellos se identificaron 124 menciones de dilemas éticos que se sintetizaron en 77, los cuales fueron clasificados en seis categorías: objetividad, conflicto de intereses, obtención y uso de información, consentimiento, competencia profesional, e intervención. Del análisis bibliométrico, se destaca que la mitad de los documentos fueron elaborados en Estados Unidos de América y ninguno en Latinoamérica; el 87% en idioma inglés y el 12.5% en español. Sin embargo, la revista Anuario de Psicología Jurídica fue la que publicó un mayor número de dilemas. De los documentos analizados, el año en el que fueron publicados más artículos fue el 2014 y la revista que más publicaciones emitió fue Psychological Injury and Law. Se concluye que son reducidos los estudios en los que se aborda el tema de los dilemas éticos en la práctica de la psicología forense, y ninguno de ellos se ha publicado en México.  Consorcio de Universidades Mexicanas A.C. 2021-09-25 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículos originales evaluados por pares application/pdf text/xml https://psicumex.unison.mx/index.php/psicumex/article/view/380 10.36793/psicumex.v11i2.380 Psicumex; Vol. 11 (2021): Psicumex Journal ; 1-29 Psicumex; Vol. 11 (2021): Revista Psicumex: (Enero- Diciembre 2021) ; 1-29 2007-5936 spa https://psicumex.unison.mx/index.php/psicumex/article/view/380/315 https://psicumex.unison.mx/index.php/psicumex/article/view/380/321 Derechos de autor 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0