Instruments to measure nursing competencies: systematic review

Introduction: It is of special interest to evaluate professional competencies in higher education and to have valid and reliable instruments or scales in nursing that identify existing competencies and those that are acquired during the process from student to professional. Objective: To identify th...

Popoln opis

Shranjeno v:

Bibliografske podrobnosti
Autores principales:	Vallejo-Gómez, Lucero, Ruiz-Recéndiz, Ma. de Jesús, Jiménez-Arroyo, Vanesa, Huerta-Baltazar, Mayra Itzel, Alcántar-Zavala, Ma. Lilia Alicia
Format:	Online
Jezik:	spa eng
Izdano:	Universidad de Sonora 2021
Online dostop:	https://sanus.unison.mx/index.php/Sanus/article/view/198
Oznake:	Označite Brez oznak, prvi označite!

id	oai:https:--sanus.unison.mx:article-198
record_format	ojs
institution	Sanus
collection	OJS
language	spa eng
format	Online
author	Vallejo-Gómez, Lucero Ruiz-Recéndiz, Ma. de Jesús Jiménez-Arroyo, Vanesa Huerta-Baltazar, Mayra Itzel Alcántar-Zavala, Ma. Lilia Alicia
spellingShingle	Vallejo-Gómez, Lucero Ruiz-Recéndiz, Ma. de Jesús Jiménez-Arroyo, Vanesa Huerta-Baltazar, Mayra Itzel Alcántar-Zavala, Ma. Lilia Alicia Instruments to measure nursing competencies: systematic review
author_facet	Vallejo-Gómez, Lucero Ruiz-Recéndiz, Ma. de Jesús Jiménez-Arroyo, Vanesa Huerta-Baltazar, Mayra Itzel Alcántar-Zavala, Ma. Lilia Alicia
author_sort	Vallejo-Gómez, Lucero
title	Instruments to measure nursing competencies: systematic review
title_short	Instruments to measure nursing competencies: systematic review
title_full	Instruments to measure nursing competencies: systematic review
title_fullStr	Instruments to measure nursing competencies: systematic review
title_full_unstemmed	Instruments to measure nursing competencies: systematic review
title_sort	instruments to measure nursing competencies: systematic review
description	Introduction: It is of special interest to evaluate professional competencies in higher education and to have valid and reliable instruments or scales in nursing that identify existing competencies and those that are acquired during the process from student to professional. Objective: To identify the instruments with validity and reliability that exist to measure comprehensive competencies in nursing students and professionals. Methodology: A systematic review was carried out in the databases PubMed, Scielo, Redalyc and with snowball method; articles published between 2000 and 2020 in English, Spanish and Portuguese were analyzed; the terms "competencies in nursing", "measurement instruments", "construction and validation", "competency measurement scales" and "validity and reliability" were used according to the descriptors DeCS, and MeSH. Results: 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. It was reported that 66% were original instruments; the mean number of items was 41.5; 80% were published in English; 33% in Asian countries, 20% in Nordic countries and 20% in Brazil; all reported reliability and validity to assess psychometric properties; 26% used Patricia Benner's theory as a theoretical reference; the study population were students, professionals and nursing specialists; different nursing subjects and specialties were used to assess competencies. Conclusions: Measurement instruments for nursing competencies are designed and adapted cross-culturally, although there is no uniformity in the application of statistical tests.
publisher	Universidad de Sonora
publishDate	2021
url	https://sanus.unison.mx/index.php/Sanus/article/view/198
work_keys_str_mv	AT vallejogomezlucero instrumentstomeasurenursingcompetenciessystematicreview AT ruizrecendizmadejesus instrumentstomeasurenursingcompetenciessystematicreview AT jimenezarroyovanesa instrumentstomeasurenursingcompetenciessystematicreview AT huertabaltazarmayraitzel instrumentstomeasurenursingcompetenciessystematicreview AT alcantarzavalamaliliaalicia instrumentstomeasurenursingcompetenciessystematicreview AT vallejogomezlucero instrumentosparamedircompetenciasenenfermeriarevisionsistematica AT ruizrecendizmadejesus instrumentosparamedircompetenciasenenfermeriarevisionsistematica AT jimenezarroyovanesa instrumentosparamedircompetenciasenenfermeriarevisionsistematica AT huertabaltazarmayraitzel instrumentosparamedircompetenciasenenfermeriarevisionsistematica AT alcantarzavalamaliliaalicia instrumentosparamedircompetenciasenenfermeriarevisionsistematica AT vallejogomezlucero instrumentosparamedircompetenciasdeenfermagemrevisaosistematica AT ruizrecendizmadejesus instrumentosparamedircompetenciasdeenfermagemrevisaosistematica AT jimenezarroyovanesa instrumentosparamedircompetenciasdeenfermagemrevisaosistematica AT huertabaltazarmayraitzel instrumentosparamedircompetenciasdeenfermagemrevisaosistematica AT alcantarzavalamaliliaalicia instrumentosparamedircompetenciasdeenfermagemrevisaosistematica
_version_	1756584909512638464
spelling	oai:https:--sanus.unison.mx:article-1982022-01-08T12:20:21Z Instruments to measure nursing competencies: systematic review Instrumentos para medir competencias en enfermería: revisión sistemática Instrumentos para medir competências de enfermagem: revisão sistemática Vallejo-Gómez, Lucero Ruiz-Recéndiz, Ma. de Jesús Jiménez-Arroyo, Vanesa Huerta-Baltazar, Mayra Itzel Alcántar-Zavala, Ma. Lilia Alicia Educación Basada en Competencias Enfermería Encuestas y cuestionarios Competency-based education Occupational Health Nursing Surveys and questionnaires Educação baseada em competências Enfermagem Pesquisas e questionários Introduction: It is of special interest to evaluate professional competencies in higher education and to have valid and reliable instruments or scales in nursing that identify existing competencies and those that are acquired during the process from student to professional. Objective: To identify the instruments with validity and reliability that exist to measure comprehensive competencies in nursing students and professionals. Methodology: A systematic review was carried out in the databases PubMed, Scielo, Redalyc and with snowball method; articles published between 2000 and 2020 in English, Spanish and Portuguese were analyzed; the terms "competencies in nursing", "measurement instruments", "construction and validation", "competency measurement scales" and "validity and reliability" were used according to the descriptors DeCS, and MeSH. Results: 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. It was reported that 66% were original instruments; the mean number of items was 41.5; 80% were published in English; 33% in Asian countries, 20% in Nordic countries and 20% in Brazil; all reported reliability and validity to assess psychometric properties; 26% used Patricia Benner's theory as a theoretical reference; the study population were students, professionals and nursing specialists; different nursing subjects and specialties were used to assess competencies. Conclusions: Measurement instruments for nursing competencies are designed and adapted cross-culturally, although there is no uniformity in the application of statistical tests. Introducción: Es de especial interés evaluar las competencias profesionales en la educación superior y contar con instrumentos o escalas en enfermería válidos y confiables que identifiquen las competencias existentes y las que se adquieran durante el proceso de estudiante a profesional. Objetivo: Identificar los instrumentos con validez y fiabilidad que existen para medir competencias integrales en estudiantes y profesionales de enfermería. Metodología: Se realizó una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos PubMed, Scielo, Redalyc y con método de bola de nieve; se analizaron artículos publicados entre 2000 y 2020 en idiomas inglés, español y portugués; se utilizaron los términos “competencias en enfermería”, “instrumentos de medición”, “construcción y validación”, “escalas de medición de competencias” y “validez y fiabilidad” de acuerdo a los descriptores DeCS y MeSH. Resultados: 15 artículos cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Se reportó que 66% fueron instrumentos originales; la media de ítems fue de 41.5; 80% fueron publicados en inglés; 33% en países asiáticos, 20% en países nórdicos y 20% en Brasil; todos reportaron confiabilidad y validez para valorar propiedades psicométricas; 26% utilizaron la teoría de Patricia Benner como referente teórico; la población de estudio fueron estudiantes, profesionales y especialistas en enfermería; se utilizaron diferentes temas y especialidades de enfermería para evaluar las competencias. Conclusiones: Se diseñan y adaptan transculturalmente instrumentos de medida para competencias en enfermería, aunque no existe uniformidad en la aplicación de las pruebas estadísticas. Introdução: É de especial interesse avaliar as competências profissionais no ensino superior e ter instrumentos ou escalas válidas e confiáveis em enfermagem que identifiquem as competências existentes e aquelas que são adquiridas durante o processo de estudante a profissional. Objetivo: Identificar os instrumentos com validade e confiabilidade que existem para mensurar competências abrangentes em estudantes e profissionais de enfermagem. Metodologia: Foi realizada revisão sistemática nas bases de dados PubMed, Scielo, Redalyc e com método snowball; foram analisados artigos publicados entre 2000 e 2020 em inglês, espanhol e português; foram analisados artigos publicados entre 2000 e 2020 em inglês, espanhol e português; os termos "competências em enfermagem", "instrumentos de medição", "construção e validação", "escalas de medição de competência" e "validade e confiabilidade" foram utilizados de acordo com os descritores DeCS, MeSH Resultados: 15 artigos atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. Foi relatado que 66% eram instrumentos originais; o número médio de itens foi de 41,5; 80% foram publicados em inglês; 33% nos países asiáticos, 20% nos países nórdicos e 20% no Brasil; todos relataram confiabilidade e validade para avaliar propriedades psicométricas; 26% utilizaram a teoria de Patricia Benner como referencial teórico; a população do estudo foram estudantes, profissionais e especialistas em enfermagem; diferentes disciplinas e especialidades de enfermagem foram utilizadas para avaliar as competências. Conclusions: Measurement instruments for nursing competencies are designed and adapted cross-culturally, although there is no uniformity in the application of statistical tests. Universidad de Sonora 2021-11-10 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Text Artículo evaluado por pares Texto Texto application/pdf application/pdf text/xml text/xml https://sanus.unison.mx/index.php/Sanus/article/view/198 10.36789/revsanus.vi1.198 SANUS; Vol. 6 (2021): January-December; e198 SANUS; Vol. 6 (2021): Enero-Diciembre; e198 SANUS; v. 6 (2021): Enero-Diciembre; e198 2448-6094 spa eng https://sanus.unison.mx/index.php/Sanus/article/view/198/268 https://sanus.unison.mx/index.php/Sanus/article/view/198/269 https://sanus.unison.mx/index.php/Sanus/article/view/198/279 https://sanus.unison.mx/index.php/Sanus/article/view/198/284 Derechos de autor 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

Instruments to measure nursing competencies: systematic review

Podobne knjige/članki