Efecto de la inclusión de inulina (prebiótico) y Bacillus subtilis y Lactobacillus sp. (probiótico) en el alimento, sobre la microbiota intestinal del camarón blanco Litopenaeus vannamei
Juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei (1.05 ± 0.1 g) were fed during 4-week with four experimental diets: control (Ctrl), inulin as prebiotic (5 g kg-1) (Pre), Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus sp. as probiotic (1 x 105 CFU g-1) (Pro), and a mix of inulin + B. subtilis and Lactobacillus sp. (5 g kg-1 + 1...
Zapisane w:
| Główni autorzy: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Język: | eng |
| Wydane: |
Universidad de Sonora
2021
|
| Dostęp online: | https://biotecnia.unison.mx/index.php/biotecnia/article/view/1440 |
| Etykiety: |
Dodaj etykietę
Nie ma etykietki, Dołącz pierwszą etykiete!
|
| Streszczenie: | Juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei (1.05 ± 0.1 g) were fed during 4-week with four experimental diets: control (Ctrl), inulin as prebiotic (5 g kg-1) (Pre), Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus sp. as probiotic (1 x 105 CFU g-1) (Pro), and a mix of inulin + B. subtilis and Lactobacillus sp. (5 g kg-1 + 1 x 105 CFU g-1) (Syn). Shrimps fed Syn diet showed significantly better feed utilization and higher growth than those in control diet (P < 0.05). The probiotic employed induced higher intestinal bacterial richness, whereas inulin in feed induced higher bacterial diversity in shrimp intestine. The most dominant bacterial phylum in the shrimp intestine among treatments was Proteobacteria with abundance ranging between 80 and 84 %. Prebiotic diet (Pre) increased relative abundance of Firmicutes in shrimp intestine (2 %) compared to the rest of the treatments (0.6 %). Nevertheless, when probiotics were included in the feed (Pro and Syn), a reduction between 3 and 13 % in the relative abundance of Vibrio sp. in shrimp intestine was observed respect to the control treatment, which represent an advantage to control potential pathogens of this genus. |
|---|
